ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2025
Sequential omics analysis reveals molecular signatures of malignant transformation in recurrent meningiomas.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling meningioma in vitro in the omics era.Human cell · 2026Review
- Optic nerve sheath meningioma exhibits neural niche-associated transcriptomic features and rare copy number variation-linked evolution.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumors in adults and have the potential for recurrence. Although most recurrent meningiomas retain their initial World Health Organization grade, a subset undergoes malignant transformation (MT). The molecular mechanisms underlying this transformation remain poorly understood. We aimed to characterize distinct recurrence subtypes-MT and grade 1-retained recurrence (GR)-using sequential multi-omic analyses. In this study, we reviewed meningioma patients with paired histological evaluations. Among these, 10 patients experienced MT and 25 showed GR. Patients with MT exhibited significantly higher Ki-67 proliferation indices and shorter overall survival. Comprehensive molecular profiling, including matched sequential recurrences, was performed on samples from six patients each with MT and GR meningiomas. Compared to GR tumors, MT tumors demonstrated a marked increase in tumor mutation burden and copy number alterations, with deletion of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A emerging as a key acquired event. MT cases also showed selective upregulation of cell cycle-related genes, including Forkhead box M1, a feature absent in GR tumors. Notably, even prior to recurrence, MT tumors displayed distinct global DNA methylation patterns, particularly in regions targeted by the polycomb repressive complex 2 and H3K27me3 marks. Our findings suggest that molecular signatures evolve during MT and that certain intermediate aggressive meningiomas may progress toward malignancy. This study underscores the importance of DNA methylation and transcriptomic profiling in understanding tumor progression and recurrence. While molecular profiling holds promise for prognostication, further research is needed to identify key drivers of MT and clarify their roles in meningioma pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.