Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2025
Timing of ceiling lift-assisted out-of-bed sitting training and outcomes in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of out-of-bed armchair positioning on oxygenation in spontaneously breathing ICU patients receiving respiratory support: a randomized controlled trial.Intensive care medicine · 2026Trial
- Development and external validation of a 90-day mortality prediction model for comatose sepsis patients: impact of cerebrovascular disease and dementia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Lift-assisted early mobilization: looking beyond timing toward device-level evidence.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly mobilization is widely adopted in modern ICU practice, but evidence regarding the safety and clinical outcomes of early ceiling lift-assisted out-of-bed sitting training (OBST) remains limited.
methodsThis prospective observational cohort study was conducted in the ICU of Zhongda Hospital, Nanjing, China. Adults aged 18–80 years who underwent ceiling lift–assisted OBST and had an ICU stay of ≥ 24 h, were categorized by the timing of their first OBST session as early (≤ 72 h after ICU admission) or late (> 72 h after ICU admission). Trained personnel prospectively collected data from electronic health records, session logs, and telephone interviews as appropriate. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for potential confounders. The primary outcome was the rate of potential safety events per OBST session; non-inferiority of early OBST was prespecified with a 2% absolute margin.
resultsBetween February 1, 2023, and May 17, 2024, 584 patients were screened, and 396 were enrolled (early: n = 136; late: n = 260). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 125 patients remained in each matched group. Potential safety event rates were 0.36% (early) vs 0.99% (late) per session (risk difference: − 0.63%; 95% CI: − 1.51% to 0.25%). The upper limit of the 95% CI was below the 2% noninferiority margin. Early OBST was associated with greater improvement in FSS-ICU scores (mean difference: 1.31 points, P = 0.020), shorter ICU length of stay (mean difference: − 2.75 days, P < 0.001), and fewer OBST sessions (mean difference: − 2.02 sessions, P < 0.001). Follow-up for 28-day post-ICU mortality was completed in 96.4% of patients.
conclusionsEarly ceiling lift–assisted OBST was associated not with increased safety event rates but with improved functional outcomes and a shorter ICU stay. These findings suggest that early OBST can be used safely in ICU mobilization and warrant evaluation in randomized controlled trials.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), ChiCTR2200066701. Registered on 14 December 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.