ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025
Automated quantification of Ki-67 expression in breast cancer from H&E-stained slides using a transformer-based regression model.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate quantification of the Ki-67 proliferation index is essential for breast cancer prognosis and treatment planning. Current automated methods, including classical and deep learning approaches based on cell detection or segmentation, often face challenges due to densely packed nuclei, morphological variability, and inter-laboratory differences. Since Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining is routinely performed, accurately estimating Ki-67 from these slides could save resources by eliminating the need for additional immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. We developed and validated a transformer-based regression model to estimate Ki-67 expression directly from H&E-stained Whole Slide Images (WSIs).
methodsWe used seven public datasets to select optimal transformer-based architectures and hyperparameters. WSIs underwent preprocessing to filter poor-quality patches, with a classification model identifying gradable patches. Only gradable patches proceeded to Ki-67 quantification. Initially, a regression model was trained on IHC-stained patches using independently annotated datasets, bypassing segmentation methods. This model generated pseudo-labels for unlabeled IHC patches, which were then paired with corresponding H&E images, with a separate model trained using only these H&E patches. Both models were evaluated separately across 1153 H&E and 843 IHC-stained WSIs, employing metrics such as R
resultsOur regression model had good predictive accuracy, with R
conclusionOur approach precisely quantifies Ki-67 expression and automates hotspot detection from WSIs, providing a scalable tool for digital pathology workflows. The cross-modality model potentially quantifies molecular expression from morphological features using H&E-stained WSIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.