SynthesisBMC medicine2025
Built environment and the evolution of cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiometabolic risk (CMR) is a monotonic if not linear continuum where, over time, incremental rises in biological risk can herald large increases in absolute disease risk and thus incident cardiometabolic disease (CMD). The built environment (BE)-green/open space, walkability, and food environment-may influence biological risk. Assessing the biological plausibility and temporal direction of such associations by linking BE features to the progression of biological indicators of CMR is essential for stronger causal inference. This review summarised longitudinal studies assessing BE factors and continuously expressed biological indicators of CMR.
methodsSix databases were searched for longitudinal studies examining associations between BE features and continuous CMR factors, including fasting plasma glucose (FPG), triglycerides, lipoproteins, total cholesterol, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Four authors screened the titles and abstracts, assessed the full text for inclusion, extracted data, and conducted quality appraisals. Associations were synthesised qualitatively, and a weighted z-score meta-analysis, incorporating study quality and sample size scores, was used to estimate the strength of the pooled evidence.
resultsSixteen longitudinal studies met inclusion criteria, with four studies examining multiple BE features. Green/open space was the most frequently examined feature (n = 9), followed by walkability (n = 8), and food environments (n = 3). Pooled weighted z-score meta-analyses showed that greater availability of green/open space environment was associated with lesser increases over time in SBP (n = 4/5, weighted z = 3.43, p < 0.001) and DBP (n = 3/3, weighted z = 2.89, p < 0.01), but findings were inconsistent for triglycerides (n = 1/2), HDL-C (n = 1/2), and FPG (n = 0/2). There was strong evidence for an association between greater walkability and lesser increases over time in SBP (n = 3/5, weighted z = 2.95, p < 0.01) and HbA1c (n = 2/2), but associations with DBP and FPG were inconsistent. Healthful food sources were associated with lesser increases over time in blood pressure, FPG and HbA1c levels (n = 1/1 for each outcome).
conclusionsThis review provides evidence for the role of the built environment in shaping CMR over time, particularly blood pressure and HbA1c, dependent on BE feature. Greater availability of green/open space environment and healthful food environment were reliably associated with a lesser progression of CMR. Evidence for walkability was inconsistent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.