ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2025
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy improves oocyte yield and embryo quality in poor ovarian responders: a pre-post cohort study.
Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPoor ovarian response (POR) is characterized by low oocyte yield, poor embryo quality, high cycle cancellation rates during controlled ovarian stimulation, and poor pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in improving ovarian response, enhancing oocyte retrieval and embryo quality, and identifying the optimal HBOT regimen for POR patients.
methodsA pre-post cohort study included 41 women aged 20–45 with POR to compare oocyte yield and embryo quality pre-post HBOT. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression analyzed the relationship between HBOT and the number of oocytes. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) model assessed the impact of HBOT on oocytes, normal fertilization rate, and available embryos rate.
resultsPaired analysis revealed that HBOT significantly increased the number of oocytes, follicle output rate (FORT), follicle-to-oocyte index (FOI), two-pronuclear (2PN), available embryos, normal fertilization rate, and available embryos rate. A nonlinear relationship was found between HBOT sessions and oocyte number (P-nonlinear = 0.016), which showed the oocytes rose significantly after two HBOT sessions, plateaued at four to seven sessions, and showed no further increase beyond eight sessions.
conclusionsCombining the controlled ovarian stimulation process with 4–7 sessions of HBOT could improve oocyte number and embryo quality in POR patients.
trial registrationThis is a pre-post cohort study. Clinical trial number: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.