ArticleBMC medical education2025
A pilot study of digital technology combined with case-based learning in clinical implantology training for specialists.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A study of the effectiveness of the BOPPPS model combined with FC-CBL in the standardized training of general medicine residents.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the feasibility and potential benefits of combining digital technology with case-based learning (CBL) in teaching clinical knowledge and skills in implantology for oral and maxillofacial surgery specialists.
methodsSix attending doctors without previous implant training were enrolled as the experimental group and received a training program that combined digital navigation technology with CBL. Post-course theoretical and procedural scores were assessed, and trainees' satisfaction was recorded. Outcomes were descriptively compared with scores of doctors who had previously completed traditional specialist training, and the preliminary nature of this comparison was acknowledged.
resultsThe experimental group demonstrated significant improvement in both theoretical and procedural skills from pre- to post-course assessments, accompanied by high satisfaction with the training. Although they started from a lower baseline, their post-course performance was similar to that of the clinicians who had completed traditional specialist training.
conclusionThe integration of digital navigation into a CBL framework was acceptable to trainees and showed potential educational value in early implant training. It helped strengthen procedural understanding and case analysis. As this was a pilot study with limited numbers, further research is planned to confirm its effectiveness and scope of application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.