Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41250122›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Nicotine Intervention and Communication for Empowering Reduction (NICER): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial among priority populations of people who smoke.

Di Pei, Aubrey Juris, Prudence Nkansah, James F Thrasher, Nicholas A Giordano, Katherine C Henderson, Claire A Spears, David L Ashley, Vanessa C Mallory, Folashayo P Adeniji and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06787937 (Communicating About Nicotine and Differential Risks of Tobacco Products in Priority Populations), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06787937 narecruitingnot on this map

Communicating About Nicotine and Differential Risks of Tobacco Products in Priority Populations

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorgia State UniversityRan2025 to 2029Enrolled1,230ConditionsTobacco Products, Smoking Behavior, Cigarette UseArmsVLNC messages, Control message
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Di PeiDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Aubrey JurisDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Prudence NkansahNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
James F ThrasherDepartment of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Nicholas A GiordanoNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Katherine C HendersonDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Claire A SpearsDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
David L AshleyTRSConsulting56, Lilburn, GA, USA.
Vanessa C MalloryDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Folashayo P AdenijiDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jordan D FosterDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Winnie NiDepartment of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Nurul KodriatiDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Adebusola OgunnaikeDepartment of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Terry F PechacekDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Alexander KirpichDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lucy PopovaDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA. lpopova1@gsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3450-4579

Funding

Communicating about nicotine tobacco product standard in cigar productsR01CA239308 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Lyudmila Popova · 2019 to 2026
$3.8M
Smokers’ Decision-Making about Tobacco Use: The Interplay of Affective and Cognitive Factors with Product CharacteristicsR01CA235719 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PECHACEK, TERRY FRANK, WEAVER, SCOTT R · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235719NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239308NCI NIH HHS R01CA239308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoking is a leading cause of preventable death, disproportionately affecting people with low socioeconomic status (SES) and serious psychological distress (SPD). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed reducing nicotine levels in cigarettes and other combusted tobacco products to minimally addictive levels, a policy with significant public health potential. However, misperceptions about very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNCs), such as beliefs that they are less harmful or ineffective for quitting, may reduce policy effectiveness. While previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the effects of using VLNCs, none have incorporated messaging to address misperceptions. This study evaluates the impact of a messaging campaign on smoking behaviors, risk perceptions, and quit intentions among people who smoke, focusing on individuals with low SES, SPD, and neither. The primary objective is to assess whether exposure to VLNC-related messages reduces the number of cigarettes smoked per day compared to VLNC use alone. Secondary objectives include examining effects on other tobacco product use, nicotine dependence, forgoing cigarettes, perceived risks, and quit intentions.

methodsThis multi-site, open-label, parallel-arm RCT will enroll 1230 adults who smoke (n = 410 per group: with SPD, low SES, neither category). After a 1-week baseline period, participants will be randomized (1:1) to receive either (1) VLNCs with messaging or (2) VLNCs only (control). Messaging will include pack inserts and digital ads shown during weekly visits to address misperceptions and encourage quitting. Participants will complete daily logs via text messages and attend weekly visits over 4 weeks for data collection, including self-reported smoking behavior, expired carbon monoxide (CO) samples, and questionnaire assessments. The primary outcome is the number of cigarettes smoked per day in the final study week (week 4). Secondary outcomes include the use of other tobacco products, nicotine dependence, forgoing cigarettes, and quit intentions. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first to examine the effects of a messaging campaign accompanying VLNC use among priority populations. Results will inform FDA regulatory strategies and public health messaging to support nicotine reduction policy implementation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06787937. Registered on 22 January 2025.

Indexed as

NicotineSmokersSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionTobacco Use DisorderAdultCommunicationFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPsychological DistressRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsNicotineHealth communicationNicotineSmoking

Identifiers

PMID41250122
PMCPMC12625726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.