SynthesisBMC public health2025
Prevalence and associated factors of diabetes-related distress among type 2 diabetic patients in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes-related distress (DRD) is a common psychological response to the demands of managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and it can adversely affect self-care and treatment adherence. However, the burden and determinants of DRD in African populations remain underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of DRD and identify its associated factors among adults with T2DM in Africa.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search of databases for studies reporting DRD among T2DM in Africa. Eligible studies were screened based on predefined criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14. Heterogeneity was assessed with I² and Cochran's Q tests; due to substantial heterogeneity, a random-effects model was applied. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test. Subgroup analyses explored variability by country and assessment tool.
resultsEleven studies were included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence of DRD was 46.0% (95%CI: 33.9%-58.1%). Emotional burden was the most commonly reported distress domain (58.7%). Subgroup analysis revealed that Sudan had the highest DRD prevalence. Presence of T2DM complications (AOR = 3.55; 95% CI: 2.34-5.37), lack of physical activity (AOR = 2.67; 95% CI: 2.19-3.27), and being married (AOR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.21-0.65) were significant associated with DRD.
conclusionNearly half of individuals living with T2DM in Africa experience diabetes-related distress, with emotional and regimen-related concerns being most prevalent. Significant factors such as diabetes complications, physical inactivity, and marital status influence DRD risk, highlighting the need for culturally appropriate psychosocial support integrated into diabetes management strategies across African healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.