Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41250074›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Patterns and trends in infection control nursing research: text network analysis.

Dajung Ryu, Hyunhee Park, Sohyune Sok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dajung RyuDepartment of Nursing, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyunhee ParkDepartment of Nursing, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sohyune SokCollege of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea. 5977sok@khu.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7547-0224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the advancement of the medical environment, health-related infections continue to increase. The study was to explore the knowledge structure of infection control nursing research using keywords and networks. It was also to identify theoretical groundings regarding the current infection control nursing theory and presented the area and level of future theory.

methodsA quantitative content analysis design was employed. Using text network analysis, keywords were derived from the abstracts of 2,651 studies conducted from 1974 to 2022, and centrality and network connection structure analyses were used to identify the keywords' structure and characteristics.

resultsIn the frequency of occurrence, vaccine is the most frequent, followed by health personnel, influenza, and glove. The connection structure analyzed using weights that the terms influenza and vaccine appeared simultaneously, followed by injury and needle, hepatitis and vaccine, immunization and vaccine, and injury and needlestick injury in order. The words health personnel, vaccine, and glove, which all showed high centrality, indicate that they are keywords studied in relation to various words in infection control nursing research.

conclusionThis study confirmed that keywords revealed through text network analysis were medical workers, vaccines, and gloves. Vaccine was closely related to terms such as influenza, hepatitis, and healthcare provider, while the term gloves was closely related to respiratory protection, injury and needles, and healthcare provider. Infection control for healthcare providers is based on evidence-based knowledge and practices, and quality evaluation of the evidence and verification of effectiveness are required. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

GlovesInfection controlNursing researchText network analysisVaccines

Identifiers

PMID41250074
PMCPMC12625615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.