ArticleBMC public health2025
Addressing health literacy among long-term unemployed persons: the FORESIGHT intervention study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong-term unemployment is associated with various health risks and low health literacy. Occupational rehabilitation organizations that employ individuals with a history of long-term unemployment may be ideal settings for promoting health literacy. The purpose of this study was to develop and test an intervention to enhance health literacy in this setting.
methodsThe intervention was developed using the steps of the Intervention Mapping protocol. It focused on nutrition, physical activity, and mental health literacy, and included both problem-based learning and practical activities. The intervention was tested using a single-arm pre-post design. Health literacy was assessed at the individual level using the European Health Literacy Scale (HLS-EU-Q16) for general health literacy, the Newest Vital Sign test for functional health literacy, and domain-specific literacies for food, physical activity and mental health literacy. Additionally, structured interviews were conducted with social workers and management staff in the participating organizations to evaluate organizational readiness for change, covering domains such as knowledge of existing efforts, leadership support, implementation climate, health literacy of participants, and available resources. Changes in individual outcome parameters over time were analyzed using paired t-tests. Regression models were used to assess the association between participation in the intervention activities and changes in outcomes.
resultsA total of nine organizations participated in the study. The organizational readiness assessment revealed an increase in management support, though a slight decline in the implementation climate was noted. A total of 171 participants (65% men; mean age = 51.9 years, SD = 9.9) were included in the baseline assessment, and 110 were included in the six-month follow-up. Approximately 50% of participants took part in the intervention activities. Positive trends over time were observed for food literacy and mental health literacy, but not for other outcomes. No clear pattern emerged in the relationship between participation in the intervention activities and changes in the outcome variables.
conclusionThis study revealed small improvements in proximal outcome variables indicating feasibility and potential impact. However, more research is necessary to determine the effectiveness of this novel problem-based learning intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.