ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Syphilis complicated with pericardial effusion: a case report.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPericardial effusion is a relatively common clinical condition that can be classified into inflammatory and non-inflammatory types, with infection being the most frequent cause. However, syphilis as an etiological factor remains extremely rare. CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year-old male was admitted to the hospital due to progressive dizziness and exertional dyspnea. Initial evaluation revealed moderate anemia, elevated inflammatory markers, and imaging-confirmed moderate-to-large pericardial effusion. Despite blood transfusions and empirical therapies (nerve nutrition, diuretics, antibiotics), persistent low-grade fever and worsening effusion necessitated pericardiocentesis, draining 220 mL of light red hemorrhagic exudate. Pericardial fluid analysis demonstrated exudative features, with negative cultures. Notably, syphilis serology revealed strongly positive results (syphilis-specific antibodies 436.62 COI; toluidine red unheated serum test 1:32), further confirmed by elevated syphilis-specific antibodies in pericardial effusion (555.64 COI). The patient denied high-risk sexual behaviors and exhibited no typical syphilitic lesions. After excluding malignancies, autoimmune diseases, and other transmitted infections, latent syphilis complicated with pericardial effusion was diagnosed. Unfortunately, robust evidence, including PCR and histopathological biopsy, is lacking to support the hypothesis that syphilis directly infects the pericardium and leads to pericardial effusion. Treatment with penicillin resulted in the resolution of symptoms and pericardial effusion, with no subsequent recurrence.
conclusionThis presentation recommends syphilis testing in patients with unexplained or recurrent pericardial effusions, after excluding more common causes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.