ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2026
Demographic Factors Influencing Eligibility for EMA in South Australia.
Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Demographic Factors Influencing Eligibility for EMA in South Australia.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly medical abortion (EMA) can be performed by administration of mifepristone and misoprostol in an outpatient setting prior to 63 days gestation in Australia. While this is a flexible, efficacious and safe option for abortion, it requires early identification of pregnancy and efficient access to a clinical service. Outpatient EMA with mifepristone and misoprostol was introduced in Australia in 2012 for gestations < 49 days, and extended to 63 days in 2015.
methodsThe laws governing abortion in South Australia mandate routine data collection. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all registered abortions in South Australia from 2012 to 2020. Women undergoing abortion before 7 weeks gestation between 2012 and 2014 and then from 2015 those undergoing abortion before 9 weeks gestation were considered EMA eligible. Demographic characteristics were then compared using multiple logistic regression.
resultsWomen who were eligible for EMA were significantly different from those who were ineligible based on gestational age. Women who were ineligible were more likely to be teenagers, live in rural and remote areas and live in areas of socio-economic disadvantage. In multivariable logistic regression teenagers were disproportionately less likely to be EMA eligible, with rural women and socially disadvantaged teenagers having the lowest rates of and eligibility for EMA.
conclusionEligibility for EMA was affected by age, rurality and socio-economic disadvantage. Interventions to improve access should investigate and address the specific barriers facing these groups of women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.