Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41249873›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical apheresis2025

Challenges in Trials in Sickle Cell Disease: Thromboprophylaxis in Sickle Cell Disease With Central Venous Catheters (THIS) Pilot Study.

Jameel Abdulrehman, Stéphanie Forté, George Tomlinson, Ziad Solh, Lauren Bolster, Haowei Linda Sun, Kevin H M Kuo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical apheresis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05033314 (THromboprophylaxis In Sickle Cell Disease With Central Venous Catheters), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05033314 phase3terminatednot on this map

THromboprophylaxis In Sickle Cell Disease With Central Venous Catheters (THIS): A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2022 to 2024Enrolled4ConditionsSickle Cell Disease, Central Venous Catheter Thrombosis, Venous ThromboembolismArmsRivaroxaban 10 MG, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jameel AbdulrehmanDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-2406
Stéphanie FortéDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de L'université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2434-9234
George TomlinsonToronto General Hospital Research Institute, Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9328-6399
Ziad SolhDivision of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1518-1831
Lauren BolsterDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6767-6748
Haowei Linda SunDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0205-9722
Kevin H M KuoDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6744-9238

Funding

Paul B. Helliwell Foundation 5790-7020-0708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) often require central venous catheter (CVC) use; however, this is associated with a high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess if it is feasible and safe to conduct an adequately powered RCT comparing rivaroxaban to placebo as thromboprophylaxis in adult SCD participants with CVC. In this pilot investigator-initiated, double-blinded, multi-center RCT, we assessed feasibility outcomes to explore if a full RCT is possible, and also exploratory outcomes of thrombosis and bleeding. THIS pilot trial was closed prematurely due to slow recruitment, lack of funding, and non-feasibility of the complete trial. Of 21 participants who met eligibility criteria, 4 were recruited into the study. Adherence to study procedures was 100% and loss to follow-up was 0%. One participant was noted to have a VTE during follow-up, but of unknown chronicity. Another participant developed a new VTE post-randomization, but prior to starting study drug. No major or clinically relevant bleeding events occurred during study follow-up. Challenges in running the study were largely due to a limited eligible population, and low participation interest in study involvement. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05033314.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellCentral Venous CathetersRivaroxabanVenous ThromboembolismAdultCatheterization, Central VenousDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsYoung AdultRivaroxabananticoagulantspilot studyrandomized controlled trialsickle cell diseasevenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID41249873
PMCPMC12623674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.