Trial reportJournal of clinical apheresis2025
Challenges in Trials in Sickle Cell Disease: Thromboprophylaxis in Sickle Cell Disease With Central Venous Catheters (THIS) Pilot Study.
Trial report in Journal of clinical apheresis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05033314 (THromboprophylaxis In Sickle Cell Disease With Central Venous Catheters), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
THromboprophylaxis In Sickle Cell Disease With Central Venous Catheters (THIS): A Pilot Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Challenges in Trials in Sickle Cell Disease: Thromboprophylaxis in Sickle Cell Disease With Central Venous Catheters (THIS) Pilot Study.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) often require central venous catheter (CVC) use; however, this is associated with a high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess if it is feasible and safe to conduct an adequately powered RCT comparing rivaroxaban to placebo as thromboprophylaxis in adult SCD participants with CVC. In this pilot investigator-initiated, double-blinded, multi-center RCT, we assessed feasibility outcomes to explore if a full RCT is possible, and also exploratory outcomes of thrombosis and bleeding. THIS pilot trial was closed prematurely due to slow recruitment, lack of funding, and non-feasibility of the complete trial. Of 21 participants who met eligibility criteria, 4 were recruited into the study. Adherence to study procedures was 100% and loss to follow-up was 0%. One participant was noted to have a VTE during follow-up, but of unknown chronicity. Another participant developed a new VTE post-randomization, but prior to starting study drug. No major or clinically relevant bleeding events occurred during study follow-up. Challenges in running the study were largely due to a limited eligible population, and low participation interest in study involvement. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05033314.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.