Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41249750›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of immunology2025

Oral and Skin Sensitisation to Peanut Show Different Immunological Features in Brown Norway Rats.

Tiffany K S Sztuk, Jeppe M Larsen, Neil M Rigby, Anne-Sofie R Ballegaard, Irina Pozdnyakova, Stef J Koppelman, Alan R Mackie, Katrine L Bøgh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tiffany K S SztukNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5794-397X
Jeppe M LarsenNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1492-0708
Neil M RigbySchool of Food Science & Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3736-7944
Anne-Sofie R BallegaardNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9925-5983
Irina PozdnyakovaNNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stef J KoppelmanInstitute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7995-1754
Alan R MackieSchool of Food Science & Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5681-0593
Katrine L BøghNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5266-0372

Funding

Innovation Fund Denmark 6159-00005B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food allergy may develop after both oral and skin exposure to food allergens. Identifying immunological features associated with the sensitisation route is important for understanding the extent to which patients are sensitised through the oral or skin route and may be required to improve food allergy immunotherapy. Thus, the present study aimed at comparing the immunological features of peanut sensitisation induced through the oral and skin route in Brown Norway (BN) rat models. Sensitisation to peanut protein extract (PPE) was induced via oral or skin administration in BN rats. Allergy development was analysed by ELISA for PPE- and major allergen-specific IgE levels and by ear swelling responses to native and denatured PPE. Intestinal and skin tissues were analysed by flow cytometry for immune cell compositions and by TaqMan PCR for the expression of cytokines. Oral and skin sensitisation showed distinct patterns of specific IgE against the major peanut allergens. Conformational IgE epitopes dominated both routes of sensitisation. Skin sensitisation was associated with the activation of T cells and the expansion of antigen presenting cells in both the intestine and skin, whereas oral sensitisation showed a limited effect on immune cell composition and activation. Oral and skin sensitisation were associated with different intestinal cytokine expression profiles. Oral and skin sensitisation drive different responses to the major peanut allergens and promote different immunological responses in the intestine.

Indexed as

AllergensArachisPeanut HypersensitivitySkinAdministration, CutaneousAdministration, OralAnimalsCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalImmunoglobulin EMaleRatsRats, Inbred BNT-LymphocytesAllergensCytokinesImmunoglobulin EAra hIgE‐binding epitopesimmune cell profilingoral sensitisationskin sensitisation

Identifiers

PMID41249750
PMCPMC12623298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.