ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Application study of endoscopic middle meningeal artery interruption combined with hematoma evacuation for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic middle meningeal artery (MMA) interruption combined with hematoma evacuation for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), providing a fundamental basis for the standardized implementation of this new surgical technique and future multicenter studies. A retrospective analysis was conducted on four CSDH patients who underwent this surgical approach between January and April 2025. Preoperatively, 3D reconstruction was used to localize the course of the MMA. Intraoperatively, under endoscopic guidance, the anterior branch of the MMA was interrupted and the hematoma was evacuated. Postoperative neurological recovery and hematoma recurrence were assessed, with follow-up for three months. All four patients successfully underwent surgery, with a mean age of 68.75 years, and no postoperative complications were observed. Postoperative CT scans showed significant reduction of the hematoma, and neurological function gradually improved. No recurrence was detected within three months. The mean operative time was 116.75 min, and the average hospital stay was approximately 15.75 days. Endoscopic MMA interruption combined with hematoma evacuation, preliminarily validated in clinical practice, can be applied to both primary and recurrent CSDH patients. This approach has the potential to overcome the limitations of failed MMA embolization (MMAE) or cases unsuitable for MMAE, and offers a novel strategy for the surgical management of CSDH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41249690What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.