SynthesisJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Deep Learning Models for Radiomics-Based Segmentation of Vestibular Schwannoma on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise segmentation of the vestibular schwannoma (VS) is essential to optimize therapeutic strategies and enhance outcomes. While manual segmentation is associated with considerable time consumption and interobserver variability, deep learning (DL)-based models can provide faster, more precise segmentation of VS lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the DL-based models in VS segmentation. A systematic literature search was conducted on May 8, 2025. Studies that developed DL-based models to perform VS segmentation based on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-driven radiomics and reported the mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) were included. Forty-one studies involving 8028 VS cases were included. The mean DSC ranged from 0.75 to 0.99 across the included studies. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled DSC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88-0.91) for the best-performing models. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the results were robust and consistent. No significant publication bias was observed. DL-based models have demonstrated encouraging performance for VS segmentation using MRI-driven radiomics. The application of these models in daily clinical workflows can optimize therapeutic stages and enhance patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.