Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41249634›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026

Anabolic-steroid therapy after geriatric proximal femur fracture: a level I evidence systematic review and meta-analysis of bone density, functional recovery, and safety.

McKenna W Box, Kyle P O'Connor, Josh Major, Troy B Puga, Winston Scambler, John T Riehl

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

McKenna W BoxDepartment of Orthopaedics, Medical City Denton, Denton, TX, USA. mckenna.box.med@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5037-9544
Kyle P O'ConnorDepartment of Orthopaedics, Medical City Denton, Denton, TX, USA.
Josh MajorCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Troy B PugaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Medical City Denton, Denton, TX, USA.
Winston ScamblerAnne Burnett Marion School of Medicine, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
John T RiehlDepartment of Orthopaedics, Medical City Denton, Denton, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults often face rapid loss of bone and muscle after a hip fracture, which can hinder recovery and independence. Anabolic steroid therapy increased bone mineral density and enhanced functional performance without notable side effects, showing potential as an adjunct to rehabilitation to support musculoskeletal recovery in postoperative elderly patients.

introductionProximal femur ("hip") fractures are associated with high complication rates and challenging rehabilitation courses in the geriatric population. These patients can develop rapid sarcopenia and bone loss. Anabolic agents such as androgenic anabolic steroids (AAS) might counteract this catabolic state, but their efficacy remains uncertain. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate whether postoperative AAS improves the outcomes in geriatric hip fractures.

methodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Wiley (inception to June 1, 2025) identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing an AAS with placebo/standard care after hip fracture. After record screening and data extraction, the data from studies evaluating AAS were analyzed using fixed-effect modeling. In addition, studies were assessed descriptively. The certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE system.

resultsNine RCTs (466 total participants; 214 received anabolic agents) met the inclusion criteria. AAS therapy significantly increased hip bone mineral density (BMD) z-score (d = 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.55; moderate certainty). The Harris Hip Score (HHS) (d = 2.85, 95% CI 2.52-3.17) and Katz Activities of Daily Living (KADL) index (d = 0.95, 95% CI 0.71-1.19) also improved with anabolic therapy. HHS and KADL index findings had very low certainty due to a high risk of bias and imprecision. No significant gain was observed in operative-leg strength versus the contralateral leg. Thirteen mild, transient adverse events (liver-enzyme elevation, sweating, hirsutism) occurred among AAS patients (13/214, 6.1%). No serious androgen-related complications were reported.

conclusionLow-dose AAS after hip fracture surgery increased BMD and improved patient-reported function without significant safety concerns. Still, evidence of functional benefits is limited by small, often unblinded trials. Larger, multicenter RCTs using standardized treatment protocols and functional endpoints will help better determine the benefits of AAS after proximal femur fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Indexed as

Anabolic AgentsBone DensityHip FracturesOsteoporotic FracturesTestosterone CongenersAgedHumansProximal Femoral FracturesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionAnabolic AgentsTestosterone CongenersAnabolic agentsBone mineral densityGeriatricHip fracturesRandomized controlled trialsRehabilitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.