ArticleScientific reports2025
Network analysis of mutuality and depression symptoms in stroke survivors in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Depression represents a challenging neuropsychiatric issue following strokes and conceptualized as a network of individual symptoms that could affect each other in network theory. Clinical characteristics of depression are influenced by mutuality of stroke survivors and their spouses. No relevant research has examined the structure of depression network and how mutuality is related to depression among Chinese stroke survivors. This study aimed to investigate the structure of the depression network model, identify the pivotal symptoms influencing depression and explore the nodes that bridge depression and mutuality among Chinese stroke survivors. A sample of 847 stroke survivors in Henan Province, China, were invited to complete a survey that included the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the 15-item Mutuality Scale (MS), which assessed depressive symptoms and mutuality, respectively. Results indicated that within the network of depressive symptoms, sadness (PHQ2) emerged as the central symptom. Getting help from spouse (MS6), attachment relationship (MS5), and concentration (PHQ7) were identified as the pivotal nodes bridging the connection between mutuality and depressive symptoms. Conversely, suicide ideation (PHQ9) and sleep disorders (PHQ3) were among the symptoms demonstrating the lowest predictability, indicating that their variance was less likely influenced by other depressive symptoms within the network. This is among the first studies investigating the inter-relationships between mutuality and depressive symptom from the network approach. Our findings provide an empirically-based perspective on the significance of dyadic interventions, with potential clinical implications for alleviating depressive symptom among stroke survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.