ArticleCommunications biology2025
Cardiac-vagal rhythm echoes on the heartbeat's mechanosensory imprint in the brain.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The heart, a highly reactive and innervated organ, plays a crucial role in brain-viscera communications. Recent research has highlighted the role of mechanosensation in the brain, where ion channels in neurons' membranes respond to heartbeat-induced pressure changes, triggering specific neural responses. Cardiac mechano-electric coupling ensures cardiac output to match venous return through beat-by-beat feedback. However, the effect of ongoing cardiac rhythms on the brain-sensed strength of each heartbeat is not well understood. This is crucial for exploring brain-heart communication pathways and for understanding the mutual influence between brain and cardiac oscillations. This study explores how cardiac rhythms influence heartbeat strength (HBS) as detected by the brain in humans. As a proxy for brain-sensed HBS, we used ballistocardiographs, which capture HBS from the back of the head while participants are in horizontal position. By modeling HBS, we demonstrate that fast fluctuations in heart rate variability significantly influences the final HBS. This suggests a direct relationship between vagal tone and subsequent neural responses to heartbeats, highlighting the necessity of studying visceral oscillations in the context of mechanosensation and inter-organ communication research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.