ArticleCommunications biology2025
Single-cell copy number alteration signature analysis reveals masked patterns and potential biomarkers for cancer.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing archaeogenetic for cancer therapy: bridging ancient DNA insights with modern therapeutic innovations.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Review
- Copy number alteration fingerprint predicts the clinical response of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Copy number alteration (CNA) is a major type of cancer genome alteration that drives cancer progression. CNA signature analysis can reveal underlying etiology and provide biomarkers for cancer treatment, and existing CNA signature analyses are all performed using bulk tissue samples. However, CNA usually affects a large proportion of genome, and the CNA profile of bulk sample does not reflect the actual CNA profiles of the individual cancer cells of the sample, especially in tumors with high heterogeneity, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Furthermore, the evolutionary trajectory of CNA mutational processes still remains elusive. Here we build a method to comprehensively analyze the CNA signatures of HCC from single-cell and bulk sample perspective, revealing patterns and potential noise signals from the usually performed bulk tissue CNA signature analysis. Single-cell signature analysis delineates the evolutionary trajectory of HCC CNA signatures, and different CNA signatures consistently emerge in different HCC evolution stages. Single-cell CNA signatures show robust performance in patient prognosis and drug sensitivity prediction. This work not only reveals specific considerations in analyzing CNA signature derived from bulk tissue but also depicts CNA evolution process and provides potential biomarkers for the prognosis and treatment of HCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.