ArticleCommunications biology2025
Boosting AlphaFold protein tertiary structure prediction through MSA engineering and extensive model sampling and ranking in CASP16.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning for RNA-Targeting Drug Design.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Review
- AlphaInterp: Mechanistic Interpretability of AlphaFold 3 Reveals How Evolutionary Information Shapes Protein Structure Prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Boosting AlphaFold protein tertiary structure prediction through MSA engineering and extensive model sampling and ranking in CASP16.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Accurate site-specific folding via conditional diffusion based on AlphaFold3.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Accurate Site-specific Folding via Conditional Diffusion Based on Alphafold3.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 have revolutionized protein structure prediction by enabling high-accuracy structure predictions for most single-chain proteins. However, obtaining high-quality predictions for difficult targets with shallow or noisy multiple sequence alignments and complicated multi-domain architectures remains challenging. We present MULTICOM4, an integrative structure prediction system that uses diverse MSA generation, large-scale model sampling, and an ensemble model quality assessment strategy to improve model generation and ranking of AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3. In the 16th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction, our predictors built on MULTICOM4 ranked among the top out of 120 predictors in tertiary structure prediction and outperformed a standard AlphaFold3 predictor. Our best predictor achieved an average TM-score of 0.902 for 84 CASP16 domains, with top-1 predictions reaching high accuracy (TM-score>0.9) for 73.8% and correct folds (TM-score>0.5) for 97.6% of domains. For best-of-top-5 predictions, all domains were correctly folded. The results show that MSA engineering using different sequence databases, alignment tools, and domain segmentation along with extensive model sampling is critical to generate accurate structural models. Combining complementary QA methods with model clustering further improves ranking reliability. These advances provide practical strategies for modeling difficult single-chain proteins in structural biology and drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.