Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41249421›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Inharmonicity enhances brain signals of attentional capture and auditory stream segregation.

Krzysztof Basiński, Alexandre Celma-Miralles, David R Quiroga-Martinez, Peter Vuust

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Krzysztof BasińskiAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland. k.basinski@gumed.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1280-3383
Alexandre Celma-MirallesCenter for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2557-6308
David R Quiroga-MartinezCenter for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8242-6395
Peter VuustCenter for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

Carlsbergfondet (Carlsberg Foundation) CF23-1491Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (Danish National Research Foundation) DNRF117Narodowe Centrum Nauki (National Science Centre) 2022/47/D/HS6/03323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harmonicity is an important feature for auditory perception. However, the neural substrates of processing inharmonic sounds remain unclear. Here, we systematically manipulated the harmonicity of sounds by introducing random jittering to their frequencies. Using electroencephalography, we studied the effect of inharmonicity on markers of auditory prediction errors - mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a - in a roving oddball paradigm. Inharmonic sounds with a constant jittering pattern generated similar MMN and stronger P3a responses than harmonic sounds. In contrast, MMN responses became undetectable when the jittering pattern changed between consecutive sounds, suggesting that prediction errors are weighted by sequential but not spectral uncertainty. Interestingly, inharmonic sounds generated an object-related negativity, a response associated with the segregation of auditory objects. Our results suggest that inharmonicity induces the segregation of the auditory scene into different streams, captures attention, and gives rise to specific neural processes that are independent from the predictive mechanisms underlying sequential deviance detection.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory PerceptionBrainAcoustic StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41249421
PMCPMC12623435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.