ArticleScientific reports2025
TL-PneuNet: a transfer learning-based pneumonia classification framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pneumonia is a severe respiratory ailment that may be caused by viruses, fungus, and bacteria. Pneumonia causes the accumulation of water, purulent material, or other fluids in the air sacs (alveoli) of the lungs. A delay in the identification of pneumonia may be life-threatening. Nevertheless, the limited radiation levels used for diagnosis result in unreliable detection, posing a significant obstacle in the field of pneumonia detection in healthcare. Transfer Learning (TL) may revolutionize healthcare by offering an effective method for differentiating between normal and pneumonia patients. Therefore, we have proposed a TL utilizing model for predicting pneumonia. Our experiment uses 5856 highly imbalanced chest X-ray images to fit different vision models such as Xception, VGG16, and ResNet152V2 using TL approach. After training, our model performs exceptionally well on the X-ray dataset, achieving an accuracy of 80.45, 80.77, and 83.17% respectively. However, the results show that the ResNet152V2 performs exceptionally well as compared to other models. Also, it achieves a precision and recall score of 79.87 and 97.69% respectively. The results exemplify the potential of our framework to help pulmonologists and physicians make rapid diagnoses of pneumonia patients by providing accurate and fast pneumonia classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.