ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficient crack and surface-type recognition via CNN-block development mechanism and edge profiling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- YOLO-Crack: Geometry-Guided Real-Time Crack Detection Framework Toward Edge Deployment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of lightweight CNN architectures for reliable multi-class classification of lung cancer using histopathological imaging techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Compact deep learning models for colon histopathology focusing performance and generalization challenges.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The quantified immune-aging dysregulation index: a large-language model-powered method for annotating and quantifying systems-level dysregulation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Applications, image analysis, and interpretation of computer vision in medical imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated crack detection plays a vital role in the structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure, yet existing methods often remain limited to binary crack identification and are computationally demanding for real-time or edge deployment. This study presents a lightweight convolutional neural network, developed through the CNN-Block Development Mechanism (CNN-BDM), for multi-class crack and surface-type classification across six categories: cracked and uncracked concrete, plaster, and wall surfaces. The proposed framework integrates domain-driven data augmentation, balanced label design, and systematic regularization to achieve a compact yet high-performing model. Through iterative refinement, the final Lite-V2 architecture achieves a macro-F1 score of 0.928 and a test accuracy of 0.957 on the SDNET2018 dataset using only 0.28 million parameters. Cross-domain evaluations further validate the model's generalization, attaining F1-scores of 0.975 on CrackForest (CFD) and 0.96 on DeepCrack. Grad-CAM visualizations confirm interpretable feature localization, while perturbation experiments under brightness and blur variations demonstrate robust resilience to real-world distortions. Comparative analysis against MobileNetV2, EfficientNet-B0, and ResNet-18 reveals that Lite-V2 delivers the highest accuracy and efficiency with up to 40× fewer parameters and significantly reduced inference latency (11 ms) on a Raspberry Pi 4. These results establish Lite-V2 as an efficient, explainable, and deployment-ready framework for practical crack classification and condition monitoring in resource-constrained environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.