Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41249404›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Efficient crack and surface-type recognition via CNN-block development mechanism and edge profiling.

Ali Raza, Fareeha Hanif, Heba Abdelgader Mohammed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali RazaDepartment of Mathematics, University of the Punjab, Quaid e Azam Campus, Lahore, Pakistan. alleerazza786@gmail.com.
Fareeha HanifDepartment of Mathematics, University of Education, Vehari Campus, Lahore, Pakistan.
Heba Abdelgader MohammedTechnical and Engineering Specialties Unit, Applied College, King Khalid University, Mohyel Asser, Saudi Arabia. hebaa@kku.edu.sa.

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University RGP2/561/46
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated crack detection plays a vital role in the structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure, yet existing methods often remain limited to binary crack identification and are computationally demanding for real-time or edge deployment. This study presents a lightweight convolutional neural network, developed through the CNN-Block Development Mechanism (CNN-BDM), for multi-class crack and surface-type classification across six categories: cracked and uncracked concrete, plaster, and wall surfaces. The proposed framework integrates domain-driven data augmentation, balanced label design, and systematic regularization to achieve a compact yet high-performing model. Through iterative refinement, the final Lite-V2 architecture achieves a macro-F1 score of 0.928 and a test accuracy of 0.957 on the SDNET2018 dataset using only 0.28 million parameters. Cross-domain evaluations further validate the model's generalization, attaining F1-scores of 0.975 on CrackForest (CFD) and 0.96 on DeepCrack. Grad-CAM visualizations confirm interpretable feature localization, while perturbation experiments under brightness and blur variations demonstrate robust resilience to real-world distortions. Comparative analysis against MobileNetV2, EfficientNet-B0, and ResNet-18 reveals that Lite-V2 delivers the highest accuracy and efficiency with up to 40× fewer parameters and significantly reduced inference latency (11 ms) on a Raspberry Pi 4. These results establish Lite-V2 as an efficient, explainable, and deployment-ready framework for practical crack classification and condition monitoring in resource-constrained environments.

Indexed as

Architectural complexitiesConvolutional neural networkDamage detectionImage modellingLightweight footprint

Identifiers

PMID41249404
PMCPMC12623950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.