Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41249397›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Aesthetic motivation shapes tourist revisit intention via push pull theory.

Changrong Peng, Meidi Zhang, Xiaodong Zhang, Xiaoqing Ma

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Changrong PengCollege of Arts, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang, China.
Meidi ZhangCollege of Arts, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang, China. zhangmeidi1030@outlook.com.
Xiaodong ZhangCollege of Arts, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xiaoqing MaCollege of Arts, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores factors influencing tourist satisfaction and revisit intention at historical and cultural attractions, which are crucial for heritage and tourism development. Using push-pull theory, a model was tested through structural equation modeling. Results show that aesthetic motivation and cost-benefit analysis positively impact both satisfaction and revisit intention. While historical and cultural motivation and service value enhance satisfaction, they don't directly affect revisit intention; satisfaction mediates this. Leisure and entertainment motivation has no effect, but functional value significantly boosts revisit intention. These findings offer insights for policymakers to support sustainable tourism growth.

Indexed as

Historical and culturalPush-pull theoryRevisit intentionSatisfactionZhengding ancient city

Identifiers

PMID41249397
PMCPMC12623449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.