ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of fluoride and calcium ion release and fluoride recharge capacity of glass-ionomer materials modified with experimental bioactive glass.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Additive Incorporation on Fluoride Release of Orthodontic Glass Ionomer Cements and Adhesives: A Systematic Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Microhardness and Chemical Composition of Glass Ionomer and Glass Hybrid Cements Modified with Experimental Bioactive Glasses.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2026Article
- The Morphological, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of Glass Ionomer Modified Polylactic Acid Polymer.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate fluoride(F) release and re-release after recharging, and calcium(Ca) release from Fuji IX(Fuji) and Equia Forte HT(E) modified with 5wt% of experimental bioactive glasses BAG and BAG-F. F release was recorded over 91 days, and F re-release over 21 days in six groups (n = 12): (1) Fuji; (2) Fuji BAG; (3) Fuji BAG-F; (4) E; (5) E BAG; (6) E BAG-F. Ca release was recorded over a period of 21 days in samples stored in distilled water or lactic acid(LA) in eight groups (n = 10): (1) Fuji; (2) Fuji LA; (3) Fuji BAG-F; (4) Fuji BAG-F LA; (5) E; (6) E LA; (7) E BAG-F; (8) E BAG-F LA. F and Ca were recorded using ion selective electrodes. ANOVA and LSD test were performed at α = 0.05. F release was significantly higher in modified variants of Fuji and Equia (BAG-F > BAG > original) at all time points, before and after recharging (p < 0.001). Increased F release in modifications was more pronounced in E than in Fuji (p < 0.05). F release after recharging was lower but dropped more slowly in both materials and modifications. The differences in Ca release were significant regarding material and time intervals (p < 0.001). The highest Ca release was recorded in Fuji BAG-F LA, followed by Fuji BAG-F, Fuji LA, Fuji, E BAG-F LA, E BAG-F, E LA, and E.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.