ArticleScientific reports2025
SHAP-based interpretable machine learning for injury risk prediction in university football players: a multi-dimensional data analysis approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Body Composition Architecture and Injury Topology in Physically Active Young Adults: A Tanglegram-Based Cophylogenetic Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Reducing Video Verification Burden: Machine Learning Classification of Head Acceleration Events in Youth Football.Research square · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sports injury prediction is crucial for university football player health, yet existing research predominantly focuses on professional athletes and lacks interpretability. Using the Kaggle "University Football Injury Prediction Dataset" (800 Chinese university players), we constructed a comprehensive 18-feature evaluation system across four dimensions: basic information, training factors, physical fitness, and lifestyle habits. We systematically compared 10 machine learning algorithms. The Support Vector Machine achieved optimal performance (95.6% accuracy, 95.7% F1-score, 99.2% ROC-AUC). SHAP interpretability analysis identified stress level (importance: 0.10), sleep duration (0.09), and balance ability (0.08) as key injury risk factors, with psychological stress showing positive correlation and adequate sleep/balance showing protective effects. Notably, lifestyle factors outweighed traditional physical fitness indicators in importance. Despite promising results, this study's single-dataset design and lack of external validation limit generalizability. Prospective validation is essential before clinical deployment. This work demonstrates the feasibility of interpretable injury risk prediction for university athletes, providing a foundation for evidence-based prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.