ArticleScientific reports2025
Computational analysis on the influence of pressure and temperature on drug solubility in supercritical CO
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning models can be applied for estimation of continuous manufacturing parameters in pharmaceutical processing of oral-solid formulations. Development of Quality by Design (QbD) has motivated the pharmaceutical sector to move towards continuous manufacturing by developing advanced computational models as well as analytical techniques. Despite the application of conventional methods, supercritical fluids (SCFs) have offered a new way for particle generation for nanonization and advanced manufacturing. In this work, the solubility of Letrozole was evaluated using temperature and pressure correlated to machine learning. KNN (K-Nearest Neighbors) and two boosted versions employing AdaBoost and bagging ensemble models are used. Golden eagle optimizer (GEOA) was applied as optimizer and tweaking hyper-parameters. Once the models were optimized, they were assessed using various performance metrics. The R-squared scores achieved were 0.9907 for KNN, 0.9945 for AdaBoost-KNN, and 0.9938 for Bagging-KNN. Among these, the AdaBoost-KNN model demonstrated the highest accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.