ArticleScientific reports2025
Modeling and optimization of Multi-Waste foam geopolymers using central composite design and neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and Optimization of Composite Thermal Insulation Layers for Mine Ecological Restoration Under Simulated Solar Radiation: Integrating Response Surface Screening with Gaussian Process Bayesian Optimization.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mode I, Mode III and mixed-mode fracture behaviour of jute-sisal fiber reinforced ternary geopolymer concrete.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mechanical and tribological response of red brick dust filled hemp-epoxy composites using response surface methodology and machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Performance of eco-friendly geopolymer loadbearing bricks for thermally comfortable structures.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Performance optimization of ultra-lightweight foamed concrete using dimethicone-infused organosilicon compound.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of sustainable construction materials with improved mechanical performance and thermal insulation and is crucial to addressing growing environmental and energy efficiency concerns. This study aimed to design and optimize foamed geopolymer composites incorporating recycled concrete sand (RCS), glass powder (GP), and date palm fibers (DPF) to improve compressive strength and thermal insulation. A comparative analysis of two modeling strategies, Central Composite Design (CCD) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN), was conducted to predict and optimize the effects of the three constituents. Experimental data were used to train and validate both models. The ANN model outperformed CCD in terms of predictive accuracy, particularly for thermal conductivity, as indicated by higher R² values and a greater overall desirability index (0.86 vs. 0.77). The ANN-optimized formulation (35.4% RCS, 4.96% GP, 0.23% DPF) achieved a compressive strength of 4.41 MPa and thermal conductivity of 0.141 W/mK. While ANN offers improved predictive capability, its limited interpretability remains a challenge. This research highlights the potential of integrating construction and agricultural waste into geopolymer matrices to produce eco-efficient building materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.