ArticleScientific reports2025
High-resolution ultrasound imaging of the spinal accessory nerve and associated injuries based on a prospective normative study and retrospective analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of a ligated spinal accessory nerve with sural graft repair.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed the feasibility of high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) for visualizing the cervical spinal accessory nerve (SAN) and explored its sonographic characteristics, anatomical landmarks, and normative diameter measurements. A prospective study was conducted in 60 healthy volunteers, in whom the SAN was categorized into three segments: between the trapezius and levator scapulae (S1), from the surface of the levator scapulae to the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) (S2), and from the posterior border of the SCM to the upper cervical region (S3). HRUS was utilized to evaluate SAN visibility and measure the maximum short-axis diameter (SD), with normative values statistically analyzed. In addition, a retrospective analysis was performed in 12 patients with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed SAN injury to characterize sonographic abnormalities. HRUS successfully delineated the SAN and adjacent structures with a 100% visibility rate across all segments. No significant differences in SD were observed between sides, segments, or sexes, though SD exhibited a positive correlation with body mass index (BMI). In patients with SAN injury, HRUS identified complete nerve rupture, with all cases presenting trapezius muscle atrophy. These findings establish HRUS as a reliable, non-invasive imaging modality for assessing SAN morphology and diagnosing nerve injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.