ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning prediction of STEMI incidence with SHAP interpretation of environmental determinants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of the respiratory disease incidence based on environmental factors using machine learning techniques in Penang, Malaysia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Interdisciplinary integration in public health emergency education: learning outcomes following a curriculum reform for preventive medicine undergraduates.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a life-threatening cardiovascular event influenced by meteorological conditions and air pollution. Traditional statistical methods often fail to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships between environmental factors and STEMI risk. This study analyzed hospitalization data from Harbin, China (2014-2023), alongside meteorological and air pollution data. Seven machine learning models, including LightGBM and XGBoost, were used to predict STEMI risk. Key predictors were identified via recursive feature elimination, and model performance was assessed with nested cross-validation. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were applied to interpret the impact of key predictors. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as AUC, accuracy, and recall. LightGBM achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.84 on the validation set, demonstrating high predictive accuracy and generalizability. Moreover, the LightGBM model improved its interpretability and predictive power by incorporating lagged effects along with recursive feature elimination (RFE). SHAP analysis identified PM[Formula: see text], SO[Formula: see text], NO[Formula: see text], and meteorological factors (e.g., air pressure, humidity, wind speed) as critical contributors, with significant lag effects observed. These findings underscore the cumulative impact of prolonged environmental exposure on cardiovascular health. This study developed a robust, interpretable predictive model that elucidates the complex relationship between environmental factors and STEMI incidence. The results provide valuable insights for early prevention, public health policymaking, and resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.