ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating the effects of soil microstructures on bacterial growth via microfluidic channels and an agent-based model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil is a suitable habitat for various microorganisms. These soil microorganisms establish complex social relationships and build biogeochemical cycles, such as carbon or nitrogen cycles, which synthesize plant nutrients and greenhouse gases. Clarifying microbial activities inside the soil is essential for agricultural and environmental fields. One of critical factors influencing bacterial activity in soil is the physical structure of the soil built by soil aggregates. The size distribution of soil aggregates widely ranges from µm to mm and creates pores with various sizes that act as pathways for air, water, and nutrients and affect microbial activities. Although it is known that pore size in soil is important for bacterial activity, how the pore size distribution affects bacterial activity remains unclear. The pore size distribution is considered to affect the movement of bacteria within the soil as well as that of air, water, and nutrients. Therefore, further investigation into the relationship between the size distribution of micrometer-sized pores in soil and the bacterial movement in micrometer space is required to understand bacterial activity in soil. In this study, we investigated the dependence of fractally distributed pore size distributions (from micrometers to millimeters) on bacterial activity, especially bacterial growth, using a polydimethylsiloxane culture device and numerical simulations. We fabricated a culture device with 2 μm depth with the pillars arranged fractally or periodically to represent soil particles and pore size distributions. Escherichia coli was cultured for 20 h in a culture device, and the results showed that final amount of E. coli was significantly higher in the device with the pillars arranged fractally than in the one with pillars arranged in an array. Bacterial growth was simulated in a two-dimensional space with pillars. The results also showed clear relationships among bacterial growth, movement, and pillar arrangement. Our findings provide insights into microbial activity inside complex physical structures such as soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.