ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of VITA shade-based tooth color categories using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the increasing interest in dental aesthetics, more patients are seeking tooth shade evaluations and whitening treatments. However, traditional methods of visually assessing tooth color with a commercial shade guide are often subjective, emphasizing the need for objective and reliable approaches in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning model for assessing tooth shade, comparing its accuracy with that of experienced dental practitioners. Seventy adult participants underwent tooth shade evaluation using the VITA Classic shade guide, with high-resolution intraoral images analyzed using deep learning techniques to detect, segment, and classify tooth shades. The performance metrics-namely, accuracy, precision, recall, and the F1 score-were employed to evaluate the tooth shade classification of deep learning models derived from six modified CNN architectures. The ResNet model demonstrated the most optimal results. A subsequent McNemar's test, which was utilized to make a comparison between the deep learning model and experienced dentist, yielded statistically significant results. The deep learning model provides a reliable and efficient alternative for assessing tooth shade assessment, minimizing subjectivity and outperforming experienced clinicians in accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.