ArticleScientific reports2025
A machine learning ensemble framework based on a clustering algorithm for improving electric power consumption performance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of electric energy consumption is critical for both user convenience and supplier efficiency. This study introduces an ensemble approach that integrates clustering algorithms with machine learning (ML) models to enhance prediction accuracy by identifying consumption patterns within buildings. The research focused on residential apartments in the metropolitan area of Korea, utilizing four evaluation methods (Elbow-Method, Silhouette Score, Calinski-Harabasz Index, and Dunn Index) across five data collection intervals (10 min, 1 h, 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month). Five ML models (CatBoost, Decision Tree, LightGBM, Random Forest, XGBoost) were assessed for their prediction performance across clusters. Additionally, ML models that exhibited high performance within each cluster were amalgamated into an ensemble model to assess the predictive performance regarding total electric energy consumption at the research site. Optimal clustering resulted in two clusters (142 houses for C0, 206 houses for C1) using monthly resampled power data. CatBoost and LightGBM exhibited the highest average prediction performance. Based on the possible combinations of the two models applied to each cluster, four ensemble models were developed: CB-CB, CB-LGBM, LGBM-CB, and LGBM-LGBM. Statistical analysis confirmed that all ensemble models significantly outperformed the control group's traditional ML approaches without clustering (p < 0.05 or 0.01). The proposed clustering-based ML ensemble model in this study can predict the energy consumed in buildings more accurately by accounting for the unique consumption pattern of each house. It is anticipated to contribute effectively to energy consumption reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.