ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated meningioma detection using skull X ray images with deep learning and machine learning classifiers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a novel diagnostic tool for detecting meningioma using skull X-ray images, combining deep learning with traditional machine learning classifiers. The goal was to explore the potential of using a cost-effective and widely accessible imaging modality for automated meningioma detection. Skull X-ray images from 158 meningioma patients (632 images) and 201 control subjects (804 images) without brain tumors or vascular diseases were retrospectively collected from St. Vincent's Hospital, South Korea. Anteroposterior, Towne, and lateral views were included in the analysis. EfficientNetB0 served as a backbone of the deep learning model. It was enhanced with transfer learning and attention mechanisms. Extracted features were integrated into traditional classifiers such as Random Forest and XGBoost to improve classification performance. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUROC. External validation was conducted using data (824 images) from Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, South Korea. In the internal validation cohort, the hybrid EfficientNetB0-Random Forest model achieved the highest accuracy (0.97), with an AUROC of 0.999. External validation results showed that Random Forest achieved the best performance among classifiers, with an accuracy of 0.74 and an AUROC of 0.76. Grad-CAM visualizations highlighted the model's focus on key cranial regions for meningioma detection. This study demonstrated the feasibility of using skull X-rays for automated meningioma detection. By integrating deep learning and traditional machine learning techniques, the proposed approach offers a promising diagnostic tool, especially for resource-limited settings where advanced imaging modalities might not be readily available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.