ArticleScientific reports2025
Study on tensile properties of Hippophae rhamnoides roots and prediction model of chemical composition in tailing areas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thermophilic Microbial Inoculant Promotes Lignocellulose Degradation During Green Waste Composting.Microorganisms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the correlation between tensile mechanical properties and chemical composition of Hippophae rhamnoides roots at different growth stages within tailings dam restoration areas, and to establish predictive models. 1-year-old, 4-year-old, and 10-year-old H. rhamnoides root systems were selected as study subjects. Through single-root tensile tests and chemical composition analysis, principal component parameters were extracted using partial least squares regression (PLSR). Combined with support vector machine (SVM) for dimensionality reduction training, a PLSR-SVM prediction model was constructed. Accuracy comparison analysis was conducted on four different prediction models.Analysis of the correlation between tensile properties and chemical composition, along with model predictions, indicates: (1) Relationship between tensile properties and age: Both the average tensile force and tensile strength of H. rhamnoides root exhibit a decreasing trend with increasing age. Regarding size effects, root tensile force follows a power-law growth pattern with increasing root diameter, while tensile strength demonstrates a power-law decay characteristic. Distinct elastic-plastic characteristics are evident in individual root stress-strain curves. Root diameter at different ages shows a negative correlation with ultimate stress, independent of strain. (2) Correlation between tensile properties and chemical composition: The tensile strength of H. rhamnoides at different ages was significantly negatively correlated with lignin content and highly significantly positively correlated with root diameter; the tensile strength was significantly positively correlated with lignin content and highly significantly negatively correlated with root diameter. The tensile properties of H. rhamnoides at different ages were significantly different from each component of the root system, and the single chemical component content could not fully explain the size effect between root diameter and tensile properties. (3) Predictive performance of models linking tensile properties to chemical composition: The PLSR-SVM model demonstrated optimal overall performance in predicting tensile properties, with the evaluated error metrics significantly outperforming traditional the principal component analysis (PCA) model, the back propagation neural network (BP) model, the PLSR model, and the SVM model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.