ArticleScientific reports2025
ML-Driven optimization of two-phase microfluidic cooling using acoustofluidic bubble actuation and nanoarray-coated micropin structures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine-Learning-Driven Performance Optimization of Nano-Modified Construction Materials: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hydrodynamic investigation of acoustic bubble-surface interactions on nanoarray-coated fins for microelectronic cooling with machine learning-based analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Demographic and emission drivers of household air pollution in biomass using communities.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a novel two-phase microfluidic cooling strategy integrating acoustofluidic bubble activation, nanoarray-coated micropin structures, and machine learning-guided optimization. Unlike conventional passive cooling, ultrasound-driven bubble actuation stabilizes boiling, prevents drying, and ensures uniform heat distribution, while nanoarray-coated micropins enhance liquid refilling via capillary forces and improve surface wettability. Experimental data were analyzed using deep neural networks (DNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) models, and statistical correlation methods (Spearman and Kendall), with interpretability provided by SHAP (DeepSHAP) and partial dependence plots (PDP). A comparison of model performance revealed that the LSTM achieved lower prediction errors than the DNN across all evaluated metrics (MAE 0.0055, SMAPE (0.8), and RMSE 0.0072), indicating its outperforming performance. SHAP and statistical analyses identified initial temperature as the most influential factor affecting heat transfer coefficient (HTC), followed by chipset material (S30-120 and stainless steel). Secondary factors include chipset configuration (SS, S30-120, S-nanorod, S-nanosheet) and nanoparticle type (SiO₂, ZnO), which significantly modulate bubble dynamics and thermal performance. PDP results highlight acoustofluidic excitation as the primary positive contributor, while flow rate and nanostructured surfaces provide moderate enhancements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.