ArticleScientific reports2025
A comprehensive survey on securing the social internet of things: protocols, threat mitigation, technological integrations, tools, and performance metrics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of social networking concepts with the Internet of Things (IoT) has led to the Social Internet of Things (SIoT)-a paradigm enabling autonomous, context-aware interactions among devices based on social relationships. While this connectivity improves interoperability, it also raises critical challenges in trust management, secure communication, and data protection. This survey reviews 225 papers published between 2014 and 18 September 2025, analyzing advancements in SIoT security. Sources include IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Springer, ScienceDirect (Elsevier), MDPI, Wiley, Taylor & Francis, and Google Scholar. Blockchain and AI/ML approaches feature prominently, with blockchain referenced in more than 50 papers, AI/ML in over 80, and many adopting both in combination. The literature is examined across architectural foundations, security requirements, and layered defenses, with evaluation most often based on latency, accuracy, scalability, and false-positive rate. The review further highlights existing security and communication protocols, attack mitigation strategies, and the adoption of blockchain, cloud, and edge computing for scalable and decentralized processing. The survey traces the evolution of SIoT research, identifies future directions to strengthen security and transparency, and serves as a reference for researchers and practitioners designing secure and decentralized SIoT environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.