ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigation on micro drilling of low carbon NiTi alloy using tungsten carbide micro drill tool.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The demand for advancements in Functional Materials due to their extensive applications especially on the development of product miniaturization is ever growing. The current study focusses on the influence of micro drilling process parameters such as tool rotational speed (1500, 2000, 2500 rpm), feed rate (0.2, 0.4, 0.6 mm/min) for a constant length of cut (500 μm) with 495 μm diameter drill tool on the low carbon nickel-titanium (NiTi) alloy, augmented with 0.05 wt% carbon. Studies on the selected rotational speeds and 0.05% carbon added NiTi are highly lacking. A blind hole of 500 μm was micro drilled on NiTi alloy using tungsten carbide (WC) micro drill bit. The results have revealed that high-speed machining at 2500 RPM facilitated the production of an accurately drilled hole with a close dimension of 501 μm at a minimum feed rate (0.2 mm/min). Under the same high-speed conditions, an increase in feed rate leads to a larger drill hole diameter due to tool outing losing precision. In addition, the drill tool experiences buckling as the feed rate increases, drill opening with pre-eminent plastic deformation, and shear, ultimately momentous in the formation of metal chips. In terms of machining time, high-speed machining requires less time (0.43 min) to complete the drilling process, whereas slow-speed machining consumes more time (up to 1.78 min). In high-speed machining, the tool edges undergo severe wear, characterized by both adhesion and abrasion. This work introduces optimized procedure to produce micro sized holes through high-speed machining of low-carbon NiTi alloy using a WC drill tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.