Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41249219›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Clinical audit of skin-to-skin contact and initiation of breastfeeding after birth.

Roghayye Asadi, Seyedeh Saeedeh Mousavi, Seyedeh Batool Hasanpoor-Azghady, Arash Bordbar, Zari Dolatabadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roghayye AsadiDepartment of Midwifery and Reproductive, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyedeh Saeedeh MousaviDepartment of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Rashid Yasemi St. Valiasr St, Tehran, Iran. saeedehmousavi310@gmail.com.
Seyedeh Batool Hasanpoor-AzghadyDepartment of Midwifery and Reproductive, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arash BordbarShahid Akbarabadi Clinical Research & Development Unit (ShACRDU), Department of Pediatrics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zari DolatabadiReproductive Health and Midwifery Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the well-established benefits of mother-infant skin-to-skin contact, the absence of immediate postnatal skin-to-skin contact and the separation of mothers and newborns appear to remain common practices in hospitals. This study was conducted to perform a clinical audit of skin-to-skin contact and the initiation of breastfeeding following birth. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 53 employed midwives and 265 postpartum mothers in two hospitals (Imam Sajjad and Shahid Akbarabadi) in Tehran Province. A census sampling method was applied. Data collection instruments included a demographic questionnaire and the national guideline checklist. Data were gathered through observation and interviews. For data analysis, descriptive statistics as well as the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were employed using SPSS (version 22). A significance level of less than 0.05 was considered in all analyses. The results showed that 69.8% of midwives had an acceptable level of awareness regarding the standards of the guideline for establishing immediate postnatal skin-to-skin contact and initiating breastfeeding within the first hour of birth. The educational performance of all midwives was deemed unsatisfactory. The practical performance of 84.9% of midwives, as observed, was reported as unacceptable, and midwives in Imam Sajjad Hospital demonstrated better practical performance compared to those in Shahid Akbarabadi Hospital (36.4% vs. 0%), which was statistically significant (P = 0.001). Furthermore, midwives' awareness was more acceptable in the age groups of 35-39 years (87.5%) and 40 years and above (100%), and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.014).

Indexed as

Breast FeedingClinical AuditKangaroo-Mother Care MethodMother-Child RelationsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIranMidwiferyMothersPostpartum PeriodPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBreastfeedingClinical auditMidwifery performanceSkin-to-skin contact

Identifiers

PMID41249219
PMCPMC12623901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.