ArticleScientific reports2025
Clinical audit of skin-to-skin contact and initiation of breastfeeding after birth.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the well-established benefits of mother-infant skin-to-skin contact, the absence of immediate postnatal skin-to-skin contact and the separation of mothers and newborns appear to remain common practices in hospitals. This study was conducted to perform a clinical audit of skin-to-skin contact and the initiation of breastfeeding following birth. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 53 employed midwives and 265 postpartum mothers in two hospitals (Imam Sajjad and Shahid Akbarabadi) in Tehran Province. A census sampling method was applied. Data collection instruments included a demographic questionnaire and the national guideline checklist. Data were gathered through observation and interviews. For data analysis, descriptive statistics as well as the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were employed using SPSS (version 22). A significance level of less than 0.05 was considered in all analyses. The results showed that 69.8% of midwives had an acceptable level of awareness regarding the standards of the guideline for establishing immediate postnatal skin-to-skin contact and initiating breastfeeding within the first hour of birth. The educational performance of all midwives was deemed unsatisfactory. The practical performance of 84.9% of midwives, as observed, was reported as unacceptable, and midwives in Imam Sajjad Hospital demonstrated better practical performance compared to those in Shahid Akbarabadi Hospital (36.4% vs. 0%), which was statistically significant (P = 0.001). Furthermore, midwives' awareness was more acceptable in the age groups of 35-39 years (87.5%) and 40 years and above (100%), and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.014).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.