Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41249213›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predicting Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) soil seedbank longevity in field using accelerated aging test in laboratory.

Akashdeep Singh, Aniruddha Maity

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akashdeep SinghDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8747-615X
Aniruddha MaityDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA. azm0343@auburn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9692-8027

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful management of weed infestations necessitates a comprehensive understanding of their biology, including longevity of the soil seedbank. This study investigated the potential of the accelerated aging (AA) test conducted in laboratory to predict the longevity of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) seeds in soil seedbank in comparison to traditional field burial methods. The test involved subjecting the seeds to two different temperatures, 41 °C and 45 °C, at 100% relative humidity up to 120 h with a 12-hour testing interval under each temperature. Literature was searched systematically to extract soil seedbank longevity data for Palmer amaranth in the United States. The AA results demonstrated a decline in seed germination with an increase in temperature and duration of controlled ageing. Seeds subjected to AA at 41 °C and 45 °C showcased substantial declines in viability-down to 14% and 8% respectively after 96 h of exposure. Additionally, seed membranes exhibited accelerated deterioration as indicated by increased electrolyte leakage, demonstrating that elevated temperature adversely affects seed structure and integrity, thereby compromising seed vigor. Polynomial regression models effectively described the decline in seed viability under both laboratory and field conditions. High correlation coefficients (r ≥ 0.97) were observed between seed viability reduction rates in AA tests and field burial studies. A predictive model, integrating laboratory AA data at 45 °C with field observations, exhibited strong agreement between predicted and actual field seed viability. This study provides evidence that the AA test can serve as a reliable and time-efficient tool for predicting Palmer amaranth seed longevity in natural soil seedbanks, offering valuable insights for developing targeted and sustainable weed management strategies.

Indexed as

AmaranthusSeed BankSeedsSoilGerminationPlant WeedsTemperatureWeed ControlSoilGerminationPersistenceSeed agingSeed deteriorationSeedling vigorSeed viability

Identifiers

PMID41249213
PMCPMC12623475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.