ArticleNature communications2025
Visual awareness sharpens and accelerates attentional sampling through enhancing inhibitory neural modulation in the attention network.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frontal theta phase modulates asymmetric posterior neural mechanisms of spatial attention.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Altered Hierarchical Visual Rhythm Tracking in Early Deafness.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Mindfulness training modulates EEG oscillations and improves shooting accuracy in competitive stress.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attentional sampling, orchestrated by neural oscillations within the frontoparietal attention network, sequentially focuses on stimuli in a dynamic pattern, thereby enhancing the efficiency of attentional selection. However, the role of conscious awareness in this default attentional process remains largely unexplored. Here, we employed the Chromatic Flicker Fusion (CFF) method to render attentional cues invisible and investigated how cue awareness modulates attentional sampling. Using a high-temporal-resolution behavioral paradigm and electroencephalography (EEG) combined with the temporal response function (TRF) approach, we found that both visible and invisible cues induced rhythmic behavioral sampling and reset connectivity between the frontal and right occipito-parietal regions, indicating that attention samples rhythmically regardless of cue awareness. Crucially, visible cues not only elicited stronger behavioral inhibition and enhanced neural alpha activity, but also triggered faster attentional sampling (~8 Hz vs. ~4 Hz) and higher-frequency frontoparietal coupling (alpha vs. theta band). These findings demonstrate that the conscious representation of attentional cues influences inhibitory neural responses within the frontoparietal attention network and modulates the attentional sampling process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.