Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41249044›Full record

ArticleThe Kobe journal of medical sciences2025

Developmental Outcomes at Ages 3-5 among Very-low and Extremely-low-birthweight Children without Major Complications Assessed at 18-24 Months.

Noriko Yamaoka, Satoshi Takada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Kobe journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Noriko YamaokaFaculty of Nursing, Kobe Tokiwa University, Kobe, Japan.
Satoshi TakadaKobe City Pediatric and General Rehabilitation Center for the Challenged, Kobe, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP15K11876JSPS KAKENHI JP18K10633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around 9.4% of infants born in Japan have a low birthweight. While some studies have clarified the developmental progress of very-low-birthweight (VLBW) and extremely-low-birthweight (ELBW) infants at 18 months, less is known about how these children fare in preschool. This study aimed to identify VLBW and ELBW infants without major complications and their behavioral and emotional characteristics as preschoolers compared to their infantile development. Participants were the parents of 28 VLBW and ELBW children without major complications. The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) 1.5-5 was administered at ages 3-5, and the results were compared with the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT). The examination outcomes were assessed at 18-24 months. Of these, 11 had normal scores on all CBCL scales, but the outcomes of the other 17 children were borderline or in the clinical range on either of the CBCL scales. Twenty-one children were screened negative on M-CHAT. Eleven had normal scores on all CBCL scales, but the outcomes of the other 10 children were borderline or in the clinical range on either of the CBCL scales. Seven children screened positive on M-CHAT, and all scored in the borderline or clinical range on either of the CBCL scales. Seven of the 23 M-CHAT items demonstrated relevance between 6 out of 10 CBCL-1.5-5 scales. M-CHAT-positive infants are likely to continue facing behavioral and emotional problems as preschoolers. Even in infants with a negative M-CHAT screening, the underlying problems may become apparent during the preschool years.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentInfant, Extremely Low Birth WeightInfant, Very Low Birth WeightChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleChild Behavior Checklist (CBCL) 1.5–5Developmental outcomesJapanModified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT)Very-low-birthweight infants

Identifiers

PMID41249044
PMCPMC13095041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.