ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2026
Dimensional Accuracy and Clinical Fitness of Customized 3D-Printed Hydroxyapatite Bone Block Grafts in Alveolar Ridge Augmentation.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This article evaluates the feasibility of manufacturing customized three-dimensional (3D)-printed hydroxyapatite (3DHA) bone block grafts using binder jetting for alveolar ridge augmentation prior to implant placement. Materials and Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of the alveolar ridge from eight patients with horizontal ridge defects were converted to STL files to generate 3D models. These models were used to design and fabricate patient-specific 3DHA bone block grafts using binder jetting. The 3D-printed grafts underwent micro-CT (μCT) scanning, generating μSTL files, which were compared with the original computer-aided design models using inspection software. Dimensional accuracy in three axes ( Results: Percentage relative differences between the original STL files and those from μCT were -2.72, -7.24, and -3.26% for width, length, and height, respectively. Root mean square deviation was 0.19 ± 0.04 mm overall, -0.22 ± 0.25 mm for the margin area, -0.08 ± 0.18 mm for the inner area, and 0.03 ± 0.11 mm for the contour. Mean gap distances at the defect site were 0.19 ± 0.22 mm (marginal) and 0.37 ± 0.12 mm (internal), which are within clinical acceptable ranges. Clinical application showed no need for intraoperative graft adjustment. At 6 months postaugmentation, bone volume increased from 164.4 ± 37.87 mm Conclusion: In this pilot study, 3DHA bone block grafts demonstrated acceptable dimensional accuracy and were successfully used for alveolar ridge augmentation, indicating their potential for patient-specific applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.