Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41248788›Full record

ArticleNeuropharmacology2026

Prelimbic cortex, but not its nucleus reuniens projections, regulates punished alcohol self-administration.

Maya N Bluitt, Wen Liu, Ana C Muñoz, Joseph M Carew, Joyce Besheer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maya N BluittNeuroscience Curriculum, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, United States; Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, United States.
Wen LiuBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, United States.
Ana C MuñozBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, United States.
Joseph M CarewBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, United States.
Joyce BesheerNeuroscience Curriculum, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, United States; Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, United States; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, United States. Electronic address: jbesheer@med.unc.edu.

Funding

Characterization of alcohol self-administration following predator odor exposure: relevance to PTSD-Diversity SupplementR01AA026537 · NIAAA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joyce Besheer · 2017 to 2026
$3.9M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA026537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alcohol use that persists despite negative consequences is observed in only a minority of those who drink alcohol and is a defining feature of alcohol use disorder (AUD). The neurobiological mechanisms underlying drinking despite negative outcomes are poorly understood. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is critical for decision-making and inhibitory control over behavior. Here, we employed a foot shock-punished alcohol self-administration procedure to examine the role of medial prefrontal subregions in drinking despite negative consequences in male Wistar rats. Introduction of response-contingent foot shock produced robust individual variability in suppression of responding, and rats were classified into shock-sensitive (SS) and shock-resistant (SR) subgroups. Using c-Fos immunohistochemistry, we showed that neuronal activation in the prelimbic (PrL) subdivision of the mPFC corresponds with suppression of responding during punished self-administration. To test the functional role of the PrL, we used chemogenetics to manipulate neuronal activity during punished sessions. Chemogenetic activation of the PrL enhanced responding during punished sessions in both SS and SR subgroups, while chemogenetic inhibition of the PrL reduced responding only in rats with an SR phenotype. We further explored how the PrL mediates punished drinking by assessing its outputs to the nucleus reuniens (Re), which plays a prominent role in aversive learning and memory. Chemogenetic activation and inhibition of PrL→Re projections had no effect on punished responding. Together, these data implicate the PrL in mediating individual differences in punished alcohol self-administration.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingEthanolMidline Thalamic NucleiPrefrontal CortexAnimalsMaleNeural PathwaysRatsRats, WistarSelf AdministrationEthanolAlcoholFoot shockIndividual differencesNucleus reuniensPrelimbic cortexPunishment

Identifiers

PMID41248788
PMCPMC12857297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.