ArticleBone & joint open2025
Capturing surgical site infection after hip fracture surgery : insights from linked routine data.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate the incidence, timing, and capture of surgical site infections (SSIs) following hip fracture surgery using routinely collected primary and secondary care datasets, and to assess the limitations of using such resources to identify SSIs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data from 1999 to 2013. Patients with a hip fracture were identified and compared with age- and sex-matched controls. SSIs were defined using diagnostic codes and categorized as 'definite' or 'possible'. Timing of diagnosis was evaluated, and risk factors for developing infection assessed, using Cox regression. Results: Among 13,920 hip fracture patients, 192 developed definite a SSI (n = 192, 2.4%) or possible SSIs (n = 15, 0.1%). Most infections were recorded in CPRD, with limited overlap between CPRD and HES. Median time to diagnosis was 130 days, with 43% of cases identified more than 90 days postoperatively. Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 3 was significantly associated with increased risk. Reoperation for infection occurred in 1.2% of cases (n = 37). Conclusion: Routinely coded data sources likely under-capture SSIs after hip fracture surgery. Poor agreement between primary and secondary care records, combined with delayed identification, limits the utility of routinely collected administrative datasets to accurately identify postoperative infection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.