Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41248483›Full record

ArticleCancer research2026

BESTDR Enables Bayesian Quantification of Mechanism-Specific Drug Responses.

Thomas O McDonald, Simone Bruno, James P Roney, Ioannis K Zervantonakis, Franziska Michor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas O McDonaldDepartment of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-5272-0187
Simone BrunoDepartment of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-9235-8226
James P RoneyProgram in Computational and Systems Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-4818-4323
Ioannis K ZervantonakisDepartment of Bioengineering, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-2386-9553
Franziska MichorDepartment of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-4869-8842

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R01GM144962National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R35GM150815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding drug responses at the cellular level is essential for elucidating mechanisms of action and advancing preclinical drug development. Traditional dose-response models rely on simplified metrics, limiting their ability to quantify parameters like cell division, death, and transition rates between cell states. To address these limitations, we developed Bayesian Estimation of STochastic processes for Dose-Response (BESTDR), a framework modeling cell growth and treatment response dynamics to estimate concentration-response relationships using longitudinal cell count data. BESTDR enables quantification of rates in multistate systems across multiple cell lines using hierarchical modeling to support high-throughput screening. Validation of BESTDR with synthetic and experimental datasets demonstrates its accuracy and robustness in estimating drug response. By integrating mechanistic modeling of cytotoxic, cytostatic, and other drug effects, BESTDR enhances dose-response studies, facilitating robust drug comparisons and mechanism-specific analyses. BESTDR offers a versatile tool for early-stage preclinical research, paving the way for drug discovery and informed experimental design. SIGNIFICANCE: BESTDR leverages time-course cell count data to provide mechanistic insights into drug actions, distinguishing cytostatic, cytotoxic, and state transitions, thus advancing dose-response modeling crucial for preclinical research and development of targeted therapies. This article is part of a special series: Driving Cancer Discoveries with Computational Research, Data Science, and Machine Learning/AI .

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsBayes TheoremCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug DiscoveryDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansModels, BiologicalStochastic ProcessesAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID41248483
PMCPMC13055639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.