Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41248421›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Development of a continuously updating evidence map in surgical education: study protocol for a living systematic review.

Victoria Werdecker, Adisa Poljo, Pascal Probst, Erik Driessen, Adrian T Billeter, Beat P Müller-Stich, Jennifer M Klasen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Victoria WerdeckerDepartment of Surgery, Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9355-9192
Adisa PoljoDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis-University Digestive Health Care Center, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2378-7048
Pascal ProbstDepartment of Surgery, Thurgau Hospital Group, Frauenfeld, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0895-4015
Erik DriessenDepartment of Educational Development and Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Adrian T BilleterDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis-University Digestive Health Care Center, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Beat P Müller-StichDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis-University Digestive Health Care Center, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jennifer M KlasenDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis-University Digestive Health Care Center, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland jennifer.klasen@clarunis.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the growing volume of research in surgical education (SurgED), the integration of evidence into teaching practice remains fragmented and inconsistent. A structured and continuously updated synthesis is needed to support data-informed curriculum development and promote best practices across training programmes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol describes the development of a living systematic review and evidence map of SurgED research. Studies will be identified through comprehensive searches of CENTRAL, PubMed and Web of Science, and screened independently by two reviewers, supported by an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted screening tool to improve efficiency. Eligible studies will include both quantitative and qualitative designs involving medical students, surgical residents and faculty. Studies will be categorised across key educational domains such as simulation-based training, competency-based assessment, feedback, mentoring and technology-enhanced learning. The evidence map will be updated at least quarterly, with new studies screened and added in near real-time to ensure that the map remains current and actionable. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this study does not involve human participants, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, presentations at national and international conferences and open access integration into the Evidence at a glance (EVIglance) evidence platform.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalGeneral SurgeryClinical CompetenceCurriculumHumansResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicArtificial IntelligenceMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGMeta-AnalysisSURGERYSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID41248421
PMCPMC12587979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.