ArticleBMJ open2025
Qualitative study on doctors' perceived barriers and facilitators towards the practice of delayed prescription: results from focus group discussions in Switzerland.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A dyadic perspective on trust in physicians and quality of life in pediatric asthma: an actor-partner interdependence model on children and their parents.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAntimicrobial resistance is one of the biggest threats posed to healthcare systems, accounting for hundreds of thousands of deaths worldwide and correlated with poorer health status and increased healthcare costs. The practice of delayed prescription seems to be an effective solution to diminish the unnecessary overprescription of antibiotics, as study results demonstrated that it does not negatively affect health status while engaging patients and addressing their desire for a prescription when visiting the doctor's office. This study investigates the point of view of family doctors practising in Switzerland, a country where delayed prescription has not yet been introduced. The main scope was to describe the perceived barriers and facilitators towards delayed prescription of antibiotics.
designA total of five online focus group discussions.
settingFamily medicine.
participants21 family doctors practising in the Italian-speaking region of Switzerland (M=51.24; SD=9.73 years of age; 62% males).
resultsFocus group discussions revealed a generally negative attitude towards delayed antibiotic prescription among participants. Thematic analysis identified three key themes reflecting perceived barriers to its implementation: (1) Maintenance of authority through a gatekeeping role, highlighting concerns about preserving professional control over treatment decisions; (2) Importance of maintaining communication, addressing fears that delayed prescription could undermine clarity and trust in doctor-patient interactions and (3) Healthcare system and guidelines for good practice, which encompasses structural and normative expectations around follow-up visits, pre-existing practices and clinical routines. These themes illustrate the multifaceted nature of physicians' resistance to adopting delayed prescription in their daily practice.An additional information that emerged from the discussions is the extensive use in the region of a practice similar to delayed prescription, called 'the stock antibiotic'. However, it is perceived very differently by physicians because it does not enforce a predetermined waiting time on patients.
conclusionsPast research has demonstrated that delayed prescription is an effective practice for reducing antibiotic consumption and promoting patients' empowerment while maintaining their satisfaction. Nevertheless, the results of this study show that doctors' perceptions of this practice are not always positive. Any attempt to introduce the practice should start with a careful evaluation of the cultural context and doctors' opinions, as their willingness to embrace the practice is crucial for its successful adoption. A more practical implication of our results stems from the discovery of the practice of the stock antibiotic, which could be described as a new version of delayed prescription, tailored to the customs and practices of the region. This aspect highlights the importance of exploring local contexts to ensure that prescribing practices can be implemented in alignment with local preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.