ArticleJMIR serious games2025
Prevalence, Sex Differences, and Predictors of Internet Gaming Disorder Among Impoverished Rural Adolescents: Cross-Sectional and Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR serious games, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Screen Time and Mental Health Difficulties Among Preschool Children in Western China: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Internet gaming disorder, and its association with aggression, impulsivity and suicide ideation among university students.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Internet gaming disorder among individuals with autism spectrum disorder in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a comparative study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Internet gaming disorder (IGD) is prevalent globally and linked to significant negative outcomes. Impoverished rural adolescents face unique risks due to limited supervision and unequal digital resources, with limited longitudinal research conducted in this population. Existing studies show sex differences in IGD prevalence, but their manifestations and mechanisms in rural populations remain unclear. Objective: This is the first large-sample cross-sectional and prospective cohort study targeting impoverished adolescents in rural areas. It aimed to determine the prevalence of IGD among impoverished rural adolescents, identify sex-specific risk and protective factors, and evaluate the longitudinal predictors of IGD. Methods: In this study, self-administered questionnaires were used to collect demographic characteristics, affective states, impulsivity, gaming time, and scores for IGD. First, the prevalence of IGD at baseline and follow-up, along with sex differences, was calculated. Correlation analysis was conducted to explore variables associated with IGD. Subsequently, multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify baseline and follow-up predictors of IGD. Results: The cross-sectional analysis at baseline included 13,931 valid responses (IGD prevalence: n=725, 5.2%; males: 489/7304, 6.7%; females: 236/6627, 3.6%). A 1-year longitudinal follow-up showed IGD prevalence of 5% (692/13,931; males: 511/7304, 7.0%; females: 181/6627, 2.7%; after multiple imputations). Common baseline factors were gaming time (females: odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% CI 1.08-1.14, P<.001; males: OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.09-1.13, P<.001), self-esteem scores (females: OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, P=.002; males: OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.97, P<.001), depression scores (females: OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.11-1.16, P<.001; males: OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.09-1.13, P<.001), and impulsive behavior (females: OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.10-1.22, P<.001; males: OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.14, P<.001). Companionship (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.97; P=.03) was a protective factor for females, while age (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.15; P=.02) and poor self-regulation (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.11; P=.001) posed extra risk for males at baseline. Longitudinal predictors were baseline gaming time (females: OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.09, P<.001; males: OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.05, P=.03) and impulsive behavior (females: OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.30-1.46, P<.001; males: OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.22-1.31, P<.001). Baseline companionship (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.23-0.43; P<.001) was a protective factor for females, while baseline poor self-regulation (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.27-1.37; P<.001) was a predictive factor for males after 1 year. Conclusions: IGD prevalence was lower in rural than in urban populations and higher in males than in females. Impulsivity, gaming time, and guardian companionship showed sex differences: females relied more on companionship, whereas males were more vulnerable to poor self-regulation. Interventions should address these differences, strengthening family support and psychological adjustment. This study provides novel insights into sex-specific pathways of IGD in rural settings and offers empirical evidence for developing targeted prevention strategies, highlighting its practical significance for public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.